Topic: Which Is Better? (Read 949 times)

Epicwin32 · « **on:** January 20, 2010, 04:17 am »

What would you fly?
A X-Wing or a Tie Fighter?

Random_Jedi2476 · « **Reply #1 on:** February 17, 2010, 11:13 pm »

You mean personal preference? cuz if not, the X-wing has always been stated to be the better fighter. hands down. it's newer than the TIE and had shields. nuff said. I'd fly X-wing.

M Doyle · « **Reply #2 on:** February 17, 2010, 11:18 pm »

Tie was far more manouverable and a skilled pilot could shread any X-wing, but as the 501'st campaing in BFII proved skilled people was something the Empire ran out of.

Random_Jedi2476 · « **Reply #3 on:** February 18, 2010, 02:37 am »

wow. not gonna lie, that is 100% new to me, guess I'm eating my words. I was ALWAYS under the impression the X-wing trumps the original TIE in every field. wasn't it's design brand new when the Rebels stole it? it's not outdated like the rest of their craft. I mean, I can see the TIE Interceptors or Advanced owning X-wings, but regular TIEs?

Quantum Rain · « **Reply #4 on:** February 18, 2010, 02:41 am »

I still prefer X-Wings over ties still...especially if you could modify it.

Stockholm Syndrome (pORG13i) · « **Reply #5 on:** February 18, 2010, 09:18 am »

the TIE had more speed and was half the size of an X-Wing. it was more maneuverable, but was lighter armed.
the power of TIEs were in there quantity - they costed about the half of an X-Wing and came in big squadrons.
the TIE has no hyperdrive. This only seems as if it'd be some weakness - TIEs came with big ships like Acclamators, Victories & Co --> X-Wing = screwed against an entire cruiser including his squadrons

in a one vs. one I'd prefer the X-Wing. It might hasn't the maneuverability of the TIE, but compensate this by having shields and can compensate some hits. it has a stronger weaponry + astromech support. In an one on one fight totally superior.

SoulPain (FanEAW) · « **Reply #6 on:** February 19, 2010, 07:12 pm »

agree with porg, i do.

1 on 1: id take my bets on the X-wing.

now in a space battle: im not sure.

M Doyle · « **Reply #7 on:** February 19, 2010, 09:00 pm »

Sheilding and firepower are meaningless if the oponent can out-manouver you,

You could put all the guns of a star-destroyer on a X-wing, but if the tie can still dodge it and get behinde, boom!

Quantum Rain · « **Reply #8 on:** February 19, 2010, 11:02 pm »

X-Wings aren't that unable to maneuver in space combat, heck, a skilled enough pilot in an X-Wing can down how many ties?

I'll admit, tie fighters have potential, but you'd need to be skilled in it to make a difference...

M Doyle · « **Reply #9 on:** February 19, 2010, 11:13 pm »

and that was the largest problem, when the Empire dropped the cloning programmes and their advanced training after the Kamino uprising for standard conscription the Empire quickly ran out of skilled pilots!
By the time of the battle of yavin, let alone endor, the Empire was using some of the worst pilots in space-warfare history...

Quantum Rain · « **Reply #10 on:** February 19, 2010, 11:15 pm »

Well to them, it was all about the numbers...the Emperor thought of quality second, and only primary for when it was absolutely important...

UDP--J.Y.F.Xue · « **Reply #11 on:** February 20, 2010, 07:00 am »

Ties are far more agile and accurate (due to its advanced sienar fleet systems targeting systems) than any reble fighters, but lacks power, a hyperdrive and shielding/armour. but in skilled hands the tie's weaknesses can be easily supressed. once you lock on to those slow moving crosswinged cigars they wont even be able to shake you, with already accurate targeting comps, all you need is to squeeze the trigger a bit longer and there u have it! who needs shields and hyperdrives? the cowardly rebs do.

i always PWN in TIE fighters on battlefront 2 online.

Quantum Rain · « **Reply #12 on:** February 20, 2010, 07:06 am »

Well actually, in battlefront two, the fighters are pretty much even there....

UDP--J.Y.F.Xue · « **Reply #13 on:** February 20, 2010, 09:39 am »

Quote from: Angelus Rain on February 20, 2010, 07:06 am

Well actually, in battlefront two, the fighters are pretty much even there....

hmmm gotta agree with that one but i'm just sorta adding in somthing extra

it's really a matter of personal preferance in BFII, but i think the TIE's wing size & shape caused it to be easily hit, while X-wings are flatter and has a smaller hit-box. but i always end up gettin' behind some slow moving buggar who depleted his staminar bar and he can't even shake me off with an immelmann while partially charged, let alone trying to hit me.

Epicwin32 · « **Reply #14 on:** March 06, 2010, 02:10 am »

Ok now lets go a little forward in time.
X-Wing or Tie Interceptor now

XThecommander · « **Reply #15 on:** March 07, 2010, 08:54 am »

I would choose the X-Wing First, since it has sheilds and a hyperdrive also it has proton torpedos...(which some people seemed to forget about)
However, in the case of Tie Interceptor or X-Wing, I pick the interceptor since it is improved and also it has a nice design to it.

Quantum Rain · « **Reply #16 on:** March 08, 2010, 12:36 am »

Interceptor V X-wing?

There I'd also have to choose interceptor unless it was facing Luke in his X-wing or Rouge Squadron...

Django (sunfalcon) · « **Reply #17 on:** March 08, 2010, 01:07 am »

X-wing Hands down the better fighter.

Epicwin32 · « **Reply #18 on:** March 09, 2010, 04:38 am »

i would go with the X-Wing but in the matter of bombing capital ships etc. which would you choose?

Y-Wing or Tie Defender?

Stockholm Syndrome (pORG13i) · « **Reply #19 on:** March 09, 2010, 02:09 pm »

TIE-Defender --- far more advanced.
The Y-wing is basically an ancient relict in comparison to a TIE-Defender...

Ultimate Empire at War

News:

Author Topic: Which Is Better? (Read 949 times)