Topic: E-WEB troopers (Read 1785 times)

Mr. Recluse, the Beta Tester(Greiv55) · « **Reply #40 on:** January 27, 2009, 04:13 am »

There already are E-webs in the game... If you haven't looked closely enough you missed the Dark Trooper Phase II's weapon which is the E-web cannon...

So really why add a weapon already in?

3-3 (my vote for topic in total)

Mandalor Vipeer · « **Reply #41 on:** January 27, 2009, 04:53 am »

correction: 4-3 (FanEAW voted for it, he never said he was voting for it not to be in bunkers, he just informed us that he didn't like them in bunkers)

Sarcastic · « **Reply #42 on:** January 27, 2009, 04:57 am »

Well that is the vote Viper. It's for E-Webs in bunkers.

3-3 still.

Mandalor Vipeer · « **Reply #43 on:** January 27, 2009, 05:00 am »

Sarcastic · « **Reply #44 on:** January 27, 2009, 05:01 am »

*sigh*

Viper, Urkspleen, and Logan for.

Me, Recluse, and Fan against.

3-3

Mandalor Vipeer · « **Reply #45 on:** January 27, 2009, 05:25 am »

Fine have it your way [censored]. IIt doesn't matter who's for or against who. It's what the vote was for. Obviously we are done here because Sarcastic says so.

Stockholm Syndrome (pORG13i) · « **Reply #46 on:** January 27, 2009, 10:24 am »

sorry to say that Viper, but sarcastic is right. the vote is for E-Web as bnker-upgrade --- which FanEAW doesn't like!

make it 4 - 3

Tanus · « **Reply #47 on:** January 27, 2009, 05:37 pm »

hmmmm as a bunker upgrade you say? very interesting indeed...

5-3 by pORG's vote count.

SoulPain (FanEAW) · « **Reply #48 on:** January 27, 2009, 11:01 pm »

ewwww.... if this is accepted it gonna be uber...

Sage · « **Reply #49 on:** January 27, 2009, 11:03 pm »

Quote from: Fi'anCorrupt (FanEAW) on January 27, 2009, 11:01 pm

ewwww.... if this is accepted it gonna be uber...

UBER IS YOUR FAVORITE WORD.

UBER ISN'T IN THE DICTIONARY.

urkspleen · « **Reply #50 on:** January 27, 2009, 11:09 pm »

It is the german word for "super". So it is in the german dictionary....although that is not really relevant.

The point is, this would not make it that uber. Notice how the E-web is only good against infantry, so that a bunker is still destroyable with vehicles, which would be my approach in the first place.

D · « **Reply #51 on:** January 28, 2009, 12:38 am »

I am against this idea because this is like making the bunker an anti-infantry turret, which is not needed because there are already tons of buildpads everywhere

5-4

Sage · « **Reply #52 on:** January 28, 2009, 12:51 am »

Quote from: D on January 28, 2009, 12:38 am

I am against this idea because this is like making the bunker an anti-infantry turret, which is not needed because there are already tons of buildpads everywhere

5-4

It's meant to be Just E-WEB Turrets.

Where the hell did the Bunker idea come from?

Stockholm Syndrome (pORG13i) · « **Reply #53 on:** January 28, 2009, 01:08 am »

Quote from: urkspleen on January 26, 2009, 11:39 pm

I was just thinking about this, and I had an idea:

Include the E-web in the game, but not as a unit. They would be stationed inside infantry bunkers, and would work well against infantry, but not as well as the buildable anti-infantry turret. This would give bunkers a sorely needed (at least in my eyes) boost.

[...]

just my opinion.....maybe have as an upgrade for the bunker, or simply reduce the number of troops you can garrison.

form urkspleen

and it was a pretty good idea in my eyes

UDP--J.Y.F.Xue · « **Reply #54 on:** January 28, 2009, 01:36 am »

how about we put indestructible e-webs around the good ground's gaps? that way any infantry unit can use them.

Mandalor Vipeer · « **Reply #55 on:** January 28, 2009, 01:47 am »

that might work too. The upgrade for bunkers was better though, because bunkers are weak and are destroyed way to fast anyway. It only takes 4 squads of infantry to kill a full one.

Stockholm Syndrome (pORG13i) · « **Reply #56 on:** January 28, 2009, 01:55 am »

or an AT-AT

Mandalor Vipeer · « **Reply #57 on:** January 28, 2009, 02:00 am »

That always works too. A bit overkill, but it works. lol

D · « **Reply #58 on:** January 28, 2009, 02:27 am »

how in the world did you factor that 4 squads of infantry can destroy a bunker

maybe if thier is only 1 squad in there

SoulPain (FanEAW) · « **Reply #59 on:** January 28, 2009, 02:36 am »

Quote from: urkspleen on January 27, 2009, 11:09 pm

It is the german word for "super". So it is in the german dictionary....although that is not really relevant.

The point is, this would not make it that uber. Notice how the E-web is only good against infantry, so that a bunker is still destroyable with vehicles, which would be my approach in the first place.

rebels rellied alot on infantry, thats why i say E-web in bunker is a no-go with me... if it is in V1, im gonna delete the unit's XML file(s) and models. thats how i hate them.

Ultimate Empire at War

News:

Author Topic: E-WEB troopers (Read 1785 times)