Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Peace Trooper]

commanders haveing blaster and rocket men in there squad would give the commander better defence vs vehicals because there are 5 people in the commanders squad it might go something like this, commander, blaster trooper, blaster trooper, rocket man, rocket man

Rejected:
-opinion was that field commanders should remain specialized units, not general use units
-the Imperial field commander is being revamped for V2 or 3 anyways.

[RedDragon924]

you mean field commanders? They aren't really supposed to be good against everything. They'll be there to provide a bonus to vehicles so they can pwn the enemy vehicles. I say nay to this suggestion.

[Dr. Doozer]

Useless in every regard. That would just make him a veritable powerhouse. That's for the Major Heroes. Nay to this.

[Peace Trooper]

why would that make him a powerhouse?  all it would be able to do it destroy 1 at-st lol

[RedDragon924]

maybe cause he's just a commander? He's not supposed to be fighting alone. What you are suggesting would allow him to move in alone and take care of most units.

[Peace Trooper]

only 2 rocket troops lol that cant take out much

[RedDragon924]

With the bonus of the commander, 2 troopers can do alot more.

[Dr. Doozer]

You'd be surprised what two can do. Took an AT-AT down with just 2. What you're suggesting is purely imbalancing the game.

[Peace Trooper]

well if anybody had any sence to bring an escort with an AT-AT that wouldent happen lolz

[Dr. Doozer]

That's not the point. The point is the rocket troopers are already deadly as is. The commander doesn't need them.

[Django (sunfalcon)]

ZOMG lets make a strategy game have no strategy and thus make it boring and not fun.  Great idea no. </sarcasm>  I vote no.

[Sapare]

I vote yes and you guys what the hell if 2 rocked guys can take down an at-at than this game sucks even more then I thought (no offense to the mod makers here) that is a thing you guys should change first! also it dose not really power him much for he loses 2 blaster guys for the 2 rocked guys. I would go on replacing the hole game again and make it more canon give the commander an at-st make rocked guys way weaker more people on the map on the same time. More then one map for the whole planed and so on before putting in new stuff I would go and make the old stuff better.

[Peace Trooper]

I vote yes and you guys what the heck if 2 rocked guys can take down an at-at than this game sucks even more then I thought (no offense to the mod makers here) that is a thing you guys should change first! also it dose not really power him much for he loses 2 blaster guys for the 2 rocked guys. I would go on replacing the hole game again and make it more canon give the commander an at-st make rocked guys way weaker more people on the map on the same time. More then one map for the whole planed and so on before putting in new stuff I would go and make the old stuff better.

i agree the only real reason i ask this is so my field commander has at least some defence and dosent get murdered by tie maulers

[Jesus Freak/ImpElite/Midna Fan]

I think he's fine enough as it is.

[e^(πi)+1=0]

yeah, a field commander in combat would really only be good against infantry, which he already is. his gun is significantly more powerful than that of an infantryman's.

[Django (sunfalcon)]

I agree its fine as it is. 

[UDP--J.Y.F.Xue]

it'd be fun mixing them around, but since the public disagrees it's a nay