Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Yes, it is too weak

17 (81%)

No, it is fine

2 (9.5%)

No, you are crazy Lyeman, the armor is fine

2 (9.5%)

Total Members Voted: 21

[e^(πi)+1=0]

i have no idea why people are having these problems. for me one squad of 2m's an easily take down a squad of T-2-B's....unless your just parking them there and using boost weapon power straight away, having them all shooting at different T2-B's.

are you playing on easy? because thats the only difficulty where 2-M's are better thanT2-B's. remember, the T-2B has the same types of advantages that the 2M does, but the 2M is supposed to be more comparable to the T4-B.

[s-t-n]

i play on medium. i just use them as they are meant to be used, as pack hunters that do lightening raids...inflicting huge damage while taking none because of the shields.

if the enemy is swarming you with T-2B's, you dont just park your 2m's at the entance...you send them out to attack before it gets to the confines of your base and they cant manuaver. and you MICROMANAGE. if its a garrisioned 2m, when its hields are down choose a T2-B with slightly weakened shiedls and use boost firepower on it. the T2-B will go boom, and you may be able to take a few more down before it dies as well. if it isnt garrisoned, make it retreat behind your lines...unless of ourse that just leaves one 2m left on the battlefiel.

[e^(πi)+1=0]

what im saying is that with hard numbers, the 2-M is weaker than the T2-B. check out the coding.

[M Doyle]

Tank go boom, armour no good...

they are ment to destroy Reb vehicles not be slaugtered by the most basic tanks

[e^(πi)+1=0]

i think all the weapons should be upgraded. a clash between opposing equal tanks should really only last like 3 to 4 shots per tank. obviously, infantry would still be terrible against them.

[s-t-n]

i think all the weapons should be upgraded. a clash between opposing equal tanks should really only last like 3 to 4 shots per tank. obviously, infantry would still be terrible against them.

(gets a huge shake of the head)

do you know how annoying that would be? all you have to do is have 4 tanks facing the same wasy, and nothing could shoot at them.

[Ceteral]

You have to admit that Kyles Idea has merit canon wise.

[e^(πi)+1=0]

(gets a huge shake of the head)

do you know how annoying that would be? all you have to do is have 4 tanks facing the same wasy, and nothing could shoot at them.

not against four tanks, or a counter-unit.

[D]

sorry kyle. but i have to disagree because you would need more than 4 tanks to destroy 4 defending tanks the ways you are speaking becasue the defenders should always get the first shot if they are facing toward the enemy. and if by a counter unit, you mean a artillery piece then maybe you should make artillery a 1 shot kill to almost everything except a AT-AT to be canon as well.

[Godzilla]

Well, look at it this way.  There needs to be a gameplay aspect to the game.  If everything was just canon to 'real life' (for example, missiles blowing things to shreads in one shot) then al it would be is a game of who get the first shot in.  If it went by that mentality then things like the AT-AT and MPTL would just wipe everything off the face of the map (lol).  I admit... Tanks shouldn't be blasting away at each other for over 20 or so shots but... Well, it can't just be a blood bath of oil and metal. ;p

[e^(πi)+1=0]

yes, and please dont post on old topics. i made that post 3 months ago.