Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

AT-TE "Crawler"

2 (6.3%)

AT-OT

0 (0%)

AT-XT

1 (3.1%)

AT-PT

0 (0%)

AT-AP "Pod Walker"(as a buildable unit for the Empire in heavy vehicle factories)

0 (0%)

AT-RT "Saddle Walker"

1 (3.1%)

AT-ST/A "Super Chicken Wallker"(10 meter tall version of the AT-ST)(the one from the battle of hoth in the movies)(check Wookiepedia for details)

1 (3.1%)

UT-AT "Trident"

0 (0%)

AT-AT Blizzard Type(General Veers Prototype)(all of the walkers from the Battle of Hoth were Blizzard type AT-ATs)(The Blizzard Division's AT-AT/Bs were all vulnerable to tow cable attacks except General Veers AT-AT/b A.K.A. Blizzard 1)

0 (0%)

All of the Above

27 (84.4%)

None of the above

0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 32

[hroghter]

Shame on you people who picked all of the above (shame on me too)
1. It will give the Empire edge on the ground if even half of those things are made.
2. It will take modders very very long time to finish it when they could have worked on bugs or crashes that they may have.
3. It beats the main purpose of building death star 1 and 2 (Why would you? If I had a ridiclously strong ground force I would capture it then blow it up unless I m lazy)

Solution think of some new rebel and ZC ground forces as well.

[Aelek]

Doesn't mean they aren't fan made...in fact, their presence on wookieepedia means they are likely to be fanon.

the AT-ST/A isnt, nor is the AT-AT Blizzard Type, or the spider thing, it was the comics/books(all of the ones I listed were either in the movies or in the star wars comics/books)
Posted on: August 30, 2007, 04:56:58 PMi only looked up Empire units. . .as I only like the Empire, but also half of those are Galactic Republic units!

[Solar]

Why do some pictures of an AT-TE have 4 legs and others have 6 legs?

http://images.google.co.uk/images?hl=en&q=AT-TE&gbv=2

Is there a difference apart from the legs

[Aelek]

no its just hard to see the 5th and 6th legs on some pics. . .

[s-t-n]

looking at that list reminded me of a quote i found on this forum a while back...from mike.nl

This isn't about making a playable wookiepedia.

[Aelek]

the Republic units are(for those of you who don't know):
AT-RT
UT-AT
AT-PT(was designed by the Republic but never got used in time for the Clone Wars)
AT-TE
AT-OT
AT-AP
AT-XT
AT-ST Prototype(designed and used in the last battles of the Clone Wars)
AT-AT Prototype(the AT-AT was originally designed in the last stages of the Clone Wars like the AT-ST but the AT-AT saw a few more battles during that era)

[s-t-n]

in my opinion, there are too many walkers there for the mod. you dont want 10 different walkers each as goodas the others but are just there cos they existed...it wont happen

[Aelek]

the UT-AT isn't a walker. . .its a hover platform. . .

[s-t-n]

and most of the rest are....

[Ross]

the UT-AT isn't a walker. . .its a hover platform. . .

Not a time for nitpicking.

[Aelek]

true. . .but the best ones I listed were:
AT-AT/B
AT-RT
AT-XT
AT-TE
AT-ST/A
and I know that the AT-PT is in the galleries so maybe I shouldn't have listed it. . .
but another good one is the AT-OT, it just looks so cool! and has more firepower than the AT-TE cept for the Heavy Projectile cannon on it, but all the other weapons on the AT-OT has more power than the AT-TEs weapon
Posted on: August 31, 2007, 06:41:35 PMthe at-ot would be for transporting troops and light vehicles, and the Laat/c would carry the AT-TEs. . .and the Laat/I would also carry troops aswell as being an assault craft
Posted on: September 02, 2007, 11:29:35 PMI found a few more but they don't really make sense. . .