Topic: AT-TE (Read 1109 times)

Aelek · « **on:** August 07, 2007, 07:07 pm »

please add the at-te the guns would have hardpoints..like general iblis' battle platform, the rear guns would be rapid fire reapeting blasters, the forward guns would be 4 heavy laser cannons and the top cannon would be a heavy projectile cannon that can bipass shields like a mass driver but it would go faster

High Admiral Roach · « **Reply #1 on:** August 07, 2007, 07:21 pm »

GOOD IDEA

Mr. Recluse, the Beta Tester(Greiv55) · « **Reply #2 on:** August 07, 2007, 09:12 pm »

Quote from: HomicideJack(Grabacr One) on August 07, 2007, 07:07 pm

please add the at-te the guns would have hardpoints..like general iblis' battle platform, the rear guns would be rapid fire reapeting blasters, the forward guns would be 4 heavy laser cannons and the top cannon would be a heavy projectile cannon that can bipass shields like a mass driver but it would go faster

Ok I kinda understood you there... but did you mean to say add hardpoints to the All Terrain Tactical Enforcer where the cannons in the rear would be Anti-Infantry guns, the ones in front being anti-vehicle turrets, and the Upper Turret being like a Mass Driver? Is that what you truely meant? Cause i hardly understood the way you said it.

and it does sound like a good idea

Doro · « **Reply #3 on:** August 07, 2007, 10:19 pm »

Tis a good idea, and will be added Eventually as its a Key Ground unit for the Republic

Mr. Recluse, the Beta Tester(Greiv55) · « **Reply #4 on:** August 07, 2007, 10:42 pm »

and i hope the LAAT/c is added as a transport unit for the ATTE or it will take a long time to get from point A (landing zone) to point B (enemy base)

anyway i hope Hardpoints are put on the All Terrain Tatical Enforcer

kandosii95 · « **Reply #5 on:** August 07, 2007, 11:13 pm »

would have to have a spawn option like Veers because the AT-TE holds 20 troops

Aelek · « **Reply #6 on:** August 08, 2007, 03:24 am »

Quote from: Greiv55 on August 07, 2007, 09:12 pm

Quote from: HomicideJack(Grabacr One) on August 07, 2007, 07:07 pm
please add the at-te the guns would have hardpoints..like general iblis' battle platform, the rear guns would be rapid fire reapeting blasters, the forward guns would be 4 heavy laser cannons and the top cannon would be a heavy projectile cannon that can bipass shields like a mass driver but it would go faster

Ok I kinda understood you there... but did you mean to say add hardpoints to the All Terrain Tactical Enforcer where the cannons in the rear would be Anti-Infantry guns, the ones in front being anti-vehicle turrets, and the Upper Turret being like a Mass Driver? Is that what you truely meant? Cause i hardly understood the way you said it.

and it does sound like a good idea

yeah that whats i meant but i'd also like to see it for the Empire as it is the prototype for the juggernaut which is the prototype for the AT-AT

kandosii95 · « **Reply #7 on:** August 08, 2007, 05:00 am »

which you would have to upgrade and produce the upgrades at a higher tech level

High Admiral Roach · « **Reply #8 on:** August 08, 2007, 10:53 am »

What where the waalkers from the clone wars video game AT-XT's i think and those fighter tanks you shoud add those for the republic
AND prododekas for the cis Yes ultimate pawnage MUHAHAHAZHAHHAHAHA

Doro · « **Reply #9 on:** August 08, 2007, 12:21 pm »

anyway, ive seen a AT-TE model we created, so dont worry it will be good

Aelek · « **Reply #10 on:** August 08, 2007, 05:03 pm »

ooh i love AT-XTs mortors true deflector shields and twin medium lasers... anyway good and yeah the upgrade stuff aswell for the AT-TE and the replacement for the juggernaut during the clonewars wouldn't it be the AT-OT?

kandosii95 · « **Reply #11 on:** August 11, 2007, 12:19 am »

AT-OT ?

Mr. Recluse, the Beta Tester(Greiv55) · « **Reply #12 on:** August 11, 2007, 01:23 am »

Quote from: kandosii95 on August 11, 2007, 12:19 am

AT-OT ?

All Terrain Open Transport, a large vehicle that can carry about 40-70 Clone Troopers

kandosii95 · « **Reply #13 on:** August 11, 2007, 02:01 am »

like in ROTS on Felucia when Aalya Secura is gunned down?

Aelek · « **Reply #14 on:** August 11, 2007, 03:36 am »

yeah all it is, is a heavily modified AT-TE but it has more defnsive guns than offensive its got 2 heavy lasers and 6 laser batteries

kandosii95 · « **Reply #15 on:** August 11, 2007, 06:47 am »

ok so that is the republis troop carrier.

Aelek · « **Reply #16 on:** August 11, 2007, 04:37 pm »

yeah while they're being shot at by anti-air

kandosii95 · « **Reply #17 on:** August 11, 2007, 09:32 pm »

the AT-OT would have to be covered, not open like in the movies. to easy to kill the troops.

Aelek · « **Reply #18 on:** August 11, 2007, 11:35 pm »

if it were created the troops couldn't be harmed while in it even while having an open top...

kandosii95 · « **Reply #19 on:** August 14, 2007, 12:46 am »

never mind

Aelek · « **Reply #20 on:** August 14, 2007, 02:21 am »

though you may be focused on Realism i just want something with the pure power too obliterate an entire company of T4-Bs

Iron-Guardsman 2413 · « **Reply #21 on:** August 14, 2007, 11:10 pm »

AT-TEs!! Yay!.... I seem to have missed the majority of the conversation. I love the way they get deployed in Ep II. Will that happen?

Iron

Aelek · « **Reply #22 on:** August 15, 2007, 02:56 am »

dunno...

Spartan051 · « **Reply #23 on:** August 15, 2007, 08:23 am »

Quote from: kandosii95 on August 11, 2007, 12:19 am

AT-OT ?

yes AT-OT its the prototype for the AT-HT which has 3 heavy guns 2 on the sides and 1 on top along with 14 anti infantry guns and 12 Av guns and 2 AA batteries( a helluva powerful machine huh?)

we also cant forget the AT-HT from battles like the assault on Mygeeto and Felucia btw i think its a good idea to put in the original Juggernaut for the Empire and not the retarded toned down version

Spartan051 · « **Reply #24 on:** August 15, 2007, 08:41 am »

"i kept wondering why evryone was talking about the 8492nd and then i remembered..... i got sick of flying the same skies with u since u started calling urselves the Grabacr fighter squadron" approximately...pops Ace Combat 5 the Unsung War
Hey homicide this familiar to u cuz im Razgriz 1 i shot u down a few times some of em like this

lol grabacr is so easy to shoot outta the sky

off that subject ATTEs in UEAW would be awesome their like my favorite walker can we put LAAT gunships in it too and make it so they work like the lancet aerial artillery? plz say yes cuz if u do im gonna have almost nuthing but venators infantry ATTE LAAT and Venators in my fleet

Aelek · « **Reply #25 on:** August 15, 2007, 05:01 pm »

you mean the Hover Platform type thing nick named the "Trident"?

Mr. Recluse, the Beta Tester(Greiv55) · « **Reply #26 on:** August 15, 2007, 07:48 pm »

Quote from: HomicideJack(Grabacr One) on August 15, 2007, 05:01 pm

you mean the Hover Platform type thing nick named the "Trident"?

you're refering to th AT-UT

Aelek · « **Reply #27 on:** August 15, 2007, 09:28 pm »

All terrain Unstable something...

Q · « **Reply #28 on:** August 16, 2007, 01:13 am »

UT-AT(Unstable Terrain Artillery Transport) not AT-UT

High Admiral Roach · « **Reply #29 on:** August 16, 2007, 01:18 am »

That thing that blows u on mytgeeto?

Altairen Draconis · « **Reply #30 on:** August 16, 2007, 01:32 am »

It is a good idea just let me share the actual info if you want it

Altairen Draconis · « **Reply #31 on:** August 16, 2007, 02:12 am »

do you guys want to see a picture of an AT-TE because i can show you guys one

Altairen Draconis · « **Reply #32 on:** August 16, 2007, 02:16 am »

well here it is

High Admiral Roach · « **Reply #33 on:** August 16, 2007, 02:18 am »

Thou shalt not double post ithink we all know what an atte looks like

Aelek · « **Reply #34 on:** August 16, 2007, 02:32 am »

Quote from: Kane on August 16, 2007, 02:18 am

Thou shalt not double post ithink we all know what an atte looks like

i got that pic as my desktop backround, anyway the UT-AT can be flipped on its back if a rocket or a missile detonates on the ground right below it

High Admiral Roach · « **Reply #35 on:** August 16, 2007, 02:38 am »

lol id call it the turtle

Aelek · « **Reply #36 on:** August 16, 2007, 02:40 am »

yeah but does a turtle have 3 turbo laser cannons on the front of it?

High Admiral Roach · « **Reply #37 on:** August 16, 2007, 02:41 am »

turtle because it flips and cant get up

Altairen Draconis · « **Reply #38 on:** August 16, 2007, 02:43 am »

no it doesnt but kane i didnt say you guys didnt know what it looks like

High Admiral Roach · « **Reply #39 on:** August 16, 2007, 02:44 am »

shhhhhhhhhhh shhhhhhhhhhh shhhhhhhhh

Aelek · « **Reply #40 on:** August 16, 2007, 02:46 am »

what? oh what about this walker i've heard of its like a giant at-st its as tall as a AT-AT but it's got the same design as the AT-ST

Altairen Draconis · « **Reply #41 on:** August 16, 2007, 02:48 am »

o be quiet there is no reason for that

Altairen Draconis · « **Reply #42 on:** August 16, 2007, 02:49 am »

not meaning you HomicideJack

Aelek · « **Reply #43 on:** August 16, 2007, 02:51 am »

oh...anyway i'll try to find the name of this giant AT-ST thing...

Altairen Draconis · « **Reply #44 on:** August 16, 2007, 02:58 am »

though i think i have the name wasnt it the AT-PT or something like that

Aelek · « **Reply #45 on:** August 16, 2007, 03:58 am »

yeah something like that...

Aelek · « **Reply #46 on:** August 17, 2007, 11:18 pm »

im not about to let this thread die just yet...its a good one...i think...lets see other people's opions! oh and that wasn't the AT-PT the AT-PT is in the galleries on this site...anyway the name of it is the AT-ST/A i think

Spartan051 · « **Reply #47 on:** August 17, 2007, 11:26 pm »

ALL OF THE WALKERS ON THAT LIST SHOULD BE IN THE GAME unless the AT-RT is to weak because unless u give it the mortar fun as an ability

Aelek · « **Reply #48 on:** August 18, 2007, 03:49 am »

yeah...

High Admiral Roach · « **Reply #49 on:** August 18, 2007, 04:43 am »

i agree more walkers!

more walkers :walls

Aelek · « **Reply #50 on:** August 18, 2007, 05:09 am »

I think the most powerful unit i listed was the AT-AT/B "Blizzard Type"

Spartan051 · « **Reply #51 on:** August 18, 2007, 01:26 pm »

i like dat idea

Aelek · « **Reply #52 on:** August 18, 2007, 04:38 pm »

not my idea got it off wookiepedia...

Altairen Draconis · « **Reply #53 on:** August 19, 2007, 03:03 am »

What is an AT-RT never heard its full name

Mr. Recluse, the Beta Tester(Greiv55) · « **Reply #54 on:** August 19, 2007, 04:17 am »

Quote from: Galactic_Commander on August 19, 2007, 03:03 am

What is an AT-RT never heard its full name

All Terrain Recon Transport

it was the method of reconisiance when a Barc speeder was not useable or available

Aelek · « **Reply #55 on:** August 24, 2007, 11:56 pm »

A.K.A. the "Saddle Walker"
Posted on: August 18, 2007, 10:26:33 PM

I found a few more Walkers, but they are way too complicated and wierd looking to add to any mod. . .

one looks like a spider but with 20 legs. . .

Iron-Guardsman 2413 · « **Reply #56 on:** August 25, 2007, 10:29 am »

Quote from: Greiv the JarJarKiller on August 19, 2007, 04:17 am

All Terrain Recon Transport

it was the method of reconisiance when a Barc speeder was not useable or available

As seen in Episode III?

evilbobthebob · « **Reply #57 on:** August 25, 2007, 03:15 pm »

Hmmm....more walkers you say...do you realise how hard it is to animate walkers? Sure, we'll probably add the important ones (AT-TE, AT-RT), but the fan made ones/ones with only with a few mentions...well, they may appear. But unlikely.

Aelek · « **Reply #58 on:** August 26, 2007, 02:09 am »

Quote from: evilbobthebob on August 25, 2007, 03:15 pm

Hmmm....more walkers you say...do you realise how hard it is to animate walkers? Sure, we'll probably add the important ones (AT-TE, AT-RT), but the fan made ones/ones with only with a few mentions...well, they may appear. But unlikely.

those aren't fan made the ones that you don't find on starwars.com I found all of these on Wookiepedia(like the AT-ST/A and The AT-AT/B Blizzard Type)

evilbobthebob · « **Reply #59 on:** August 30, 2007, 04:23 pm »

Doesn't mean they aren't fan made...in fact, their presence on wookieepedia means they are likely to be fanon.

hroghter · « **Reply #60 on:** August 30, 2007, 09:36 pm »

Shame on you people who picked all of the above (shame on me too)
1. It will give the Empire edge on the ground if even half of those things are made.
2. It will take modders very very long time to finish it when they could have worked on bugs or crashes that they may have.
3. It beats the main purpose of building death star 1 and 2 (Why would you? If I had a ridiclously strong ground force I would capture it then blow it up unless I m lazy)

Solution think of some new rebel and ZC ground forces as well.

Aelek · « **Reply #61 on:** August 30, 2007, 10:58 pm »

Quote from: evilbobthebob on August 30, 2007, 04:23 pm

Doesn't mean they aren't fan made...in fact, their presence on wookieepedia means they are likely to be fanon.

the AT-ST/A isnt, nor is the AT-AT Blizzard Type, or the spider thing, it was the comics/books(all of the ones I listed were either in the movies or in the star wars comics/books)
Posted on: August 30, 2007, 04:56:58 PM

i only looked up Empire units. . .as I only like the Empire, but also half of those are Galactic Republic units!

Solar · « **Reply #62 on:** August 31, 2007, 04:42 pm »

Why do some pictures of an AT-TE have 4 legs and others have 6 legs?

http://images.google.co.uk/images?hl=en&q=AT-TE&gbv=2

Is there a difference apart from the legs

Aelek · « **Reply #63 on:** August 31, 2007, 11:02 pm »

no its just hard to see the 5th and 6th legs on some pics. . .

s-t-n · « **Reply #64 on:** August 31, 2007, 11:09 pm »

looking at that list reminded me of a quote i found on this forum a while back...from mike.nl

Quote

This isn't about making a playable wookiepedia.

Aelek · « **Reply #65 on:** August 31, 2007, 11:15 pm »

the Republic units are(for those of you who don't know):
AT-RT
UT-AT
AT-PT(was designed by the Republic but never got used in time for the Clone Wars)
AT-TE
AT-OT
AT-AP
AT-XT
AT-ST Prototype(designed and used in the last battles of the Clone Wars)
AT-AT Prototype(the AT-AT was originally designed in the last stages of the Clone Wars like the AT-ST but the AT-AT saw a few more battles during that era)

s-t-n · « **Reply #66 on:** August 31, 2007, 11:31 pm »

in my opinion, there are too many walkers there for the mod. you dont want 10 different walkers each as goodas the others but are just there cos they existed...it wont happen

Aelek · « **Reply #67 on:** August 31, 2007, 11:33 pm »

the UT-AT isn't a walker. . .its a hover platform. . .

s-t-n · « **Reply #68 on:** August 31, 2007, 11:34 pm »

and most of the rest are....

Ross · « **Reply #69 on:** September 01, 2007, 12:13 am »

Quote from: HomicideJack(Grabacr One) on August 31, 2007, 11:33 pm

the UT-AT isn't a walker. . .its a hover platform. . .

Not a time for nitpicking.

Aelek · « **Reply #70 on:** September 07, 2007, 01:40 pm »

true. . .but the best ones I listed were:
AT-AT/B
AT-RT
AT-XT
AT-TE
AT-ST/A
and I know that the AT-PT is in the galleries so maybe I shouldn't have listed it. . .
but another good one is the AT-OT, it just looks so cool! and has more firepower than the AT-TE cept for the Heavy Projectile cannon on it, but all the other weapons on the AT-OT has more power than the AT-TEs weapon
Posted on: August 31, 2007, 06:41:35 PM

the at-ot would be for transporting troops and light vehicles, and the Laat/c would carry the AT-TEs. . .and the Laat/I would also carry troops aswell as being an assault craft
Posted on: September 02, 2007, 11:29:35 PM

I found a few more but they don't really make sense. . .

Ultimate Empire at War

News:

Poll

Add the following

Author Topic: AT-TE (Read 1109 times)